Updates

Farming and Biodiversity can Coexist, Say Stanford Researchers

Yellow-billed CaciqueTo keep up with projected demand, farming output will need to double in the next few decades. This inconvenient fact is bad news for the environment as a whole, and biodiversity in particular. Large-scale, high-intensity agricultural production, scientists say, dramatically reduces variation between bird communities of different areas.

But Stanford scientists say there may be a way to increase agricultural land without substantially impacting biodiversity.

A new paper by biology graduate student Daniel Karp, with Stanford biology professors and Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment fellows, Gretchen Daily and Paul Ehrlich, shows that low-intensity tropical agriculture can maintain regional species differences at levels similar to those of intact forest. The study appears in June 22 issue of the journal ‘Ecology Letters’.

“It’s one way of addressing a basic question,” said Karp. “How can we feed people while preserving biodiversity?”

Animal Farm

Karp was interested in “beta-diversity” – not the sheer number of species present in a region, but the differences between the sets of species that live in two different regions.

“The tropics have many more species total, which people know,” said Karp. “But they also have a lot more beta-diversity,” making Costa Rica an ideal place to study the ecological effects of agriculture.

The researchers found that “specialist” species that are adapted to particular food sources and environmental conditions disappear as land is converted to intensive agriculture. The process leaves the same population of “generalist” species in most converted lands, decreasing beta-diversity between formerly distinct regions.

“To a bird, high-intensity production is basically going to look the same no matter where it is,” said Karp. “A melon plantation in the north of Costa Rica is going to look the same as a pineapple plantation in the south.”

But agriculture on a small scale, or agriculture that leaves trees or other native species intermingled with crops, retains forest-like levels of beta-diversity.

The paper’s data came from 10 years’ worth of bird species monitoring from ornithologist Jim Zook, working with Daily and Stanford’s Center for Conservation Biology. His unique transects through different plots of Costa Rican land – some forested, some under heavy agricultural use and some in between – and years of patient monitoring have provided insight into the impacts of alternative agricultural strategies.

Services Rendered

In a previous paper from the team, Zook’s data showed that careful stewardship may allow agriculture and biodiversity to coexist and suggested that preservation may not need to be an all-or-nothing proposition.

Farms, for instance, rely on birds for pollination, fruit dispersal and pest control. More generally, the presence of intact, biodiverse lands near a farm guarantees society certain natural benefits, including water purification and nutrient cycling.

“If these birds are locked up in a preserve far from humans, you’re not going to get any of those services as a farmer,” Karp said.

Costa Rica is already one of the first nations to adopt a “payments for ecosystem services”, or PES, scheme. Acknowledging the value of keeping undeveloped land near agricultural areas, the policy compensates farmers for leaving part of their lands out of production. The new biodiversity finding offers further support for the practice, as Daily has addressed previously.

“Reducing pressure from population growth and consumption are crucial for achieving sustainability,” Karp said. “But we also need to start thinking about making smarter societies – in which we can grow food and preserve ecosystem services and species at the same time.”


Details of the Paper:

Title of the Paper: “Intensive Agriculture Erodes β-diversity at Large Scales”
Authors: Daniel S. Karp, Andrew J. Rominger, Jim Zook, Jai Ranganathan, Paul R. Ehrlich and Gretchen C. Daily
Published online in ‘Ecology Letters’ on June 21, 2012; DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01815.x
Check the following link to read/download the Full Paper:


Source: By Max Mcclure, Stanford University.


Comments are closed.

TOP STORIES

August 19th is Earth Overshoot Day for 2014

Earth Overshoot Day marks the date this year that our global Ecological Footprint exceeds our planet’s annual budget, putting uneven pressure on national economies.

Read More

New Reports Raise Serious Concerns about Electricity and Water

Expansion of conventional thermo-electric power production and economic growth will be constrained by 2040 because water supplies may be insufficient, warn new reports.

Read More

Climate Data from 2013 Reflect Trends of a Warming Planet

In 2013, vast majority of worldwide climate indicators - greenhouse gases, sea levels, global temperatures, sea ice extent, cloud cover, ocean salinity, snow cover - reflected trends of a warmer ...

Read More

Climate Efforts Undermined by EU’s Coal Addiction

Germany, UK rank joint first in “Europe’s Dirty 30” report, which exposes top 30 polluting power plants in the EU, ranked according to their total CO2 emissions in 2013.

Read More

Germany Tops Global Energy Efficiency Rankings

US places 13th out of 16, behind India and South Korea, while Germany wins “World Cup” of energy efficiency in 2nd international scorecard that evaluates 16 leading world economies.

Read More

Trending Now

Enter your email address to subscribe to ThinktoSustain.com and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Green Jobs