Farming and Biodiversity can Coexist, Say Stanford Researchers

Yellow-billed CaciqueTo keep up with projected demand, farming output will need to double in the next few decades. This inconvenient fact is bad news for the environment as a whole, and biodiversity in particular. Large-scale, high-intensity agricultural production, scientists say, dramatically reduces variation between bird communities of different areas.

But Stanford scientists say there may be a way to increase agricultural land without substantially impacting biodiversity.

A new paper by biology graduate student Daniel Karp, with Stanford biology professors and Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment fellows, Gretchen Daily and Paul Ehrlich, shows that low-intensity tropical agriculture can maintain regional species differences at levels similar to those of intact forest. The study appears in June 22 issue of the journal ‘Ecology Letters’.

“It’s one way of addressing a basic question,” said Karp. “How can we feed people while preserving biodiversity?”

Animal Farm

Karp was interested in “beta-diversity” – not the sheer number of species present in a region, but the differences between the sets of species that live in two different regions.

“The tropics have many more species total, which people know,” said Karp. “But they also have a lot more beta-diversity,” making Costa Rica an ideal place to study the ecological effects of agriculture.

The researchers found that “specialist” species that are adapted to particular food sources and environmental conditions disappear as land is converted to intensive agriculture. The process leaves the same population of “generalist” species in most converted lands, decreasing beta-diversity between formerly distinct regions.

“To a bird, high-intensity production is basically going to look the same no matter where it is,” said Karp. “A melon plantation in the north of Costa Rica is going to look the same as a pineapple plantation in the south.”

But agriculture on a small scale, or agriculture that leaves trees or other native species intermingled with crops, retains forest-like levels of beta-diversity.

The paper’s data came from 10 years’ worth of bird species monitoring from ornithologist Jim Zook, working with Daily and Stanford’s Center for Conservation Biology. His unique transects through different plots of Costa Rican land – some forested, some under heavy agricultural use and some in between – and years of patient monitoring have provided insight into the impacts of alternative agricultural strategies.

Services Rendered

In a previous paper from the team, Zook’s data showed that careful stewardship may allow agriculture and biodiversity to coexist and suggested that preservation may not need to be an all-or-nothing proposition.

Farms, for instance, rely on birds for pollination, fruit dispersal and pest control. More generally, the presence of intact, biodiverse lands near a farm guarantees society certain natural benefits, including water purification and nutrient cycling.

“If these birds are locked up in a preserve far from humans, you’re not going to get any of those services as a farmer,” Karp said.

Costa Rica is already one of the first nations to adopt a “payments for ecosystem services”, or PES, scheme. Acknowledging the value of keeping undeveloped land near agricultural areas, the policy compensates farmers for leaving part of their lands out of production. The new biodiversity finding offers further support for the practice, as Daily has addressed previously.

“Reducing pressure from population growth and consumption are crucial for achieving sustainability,” Karp said. “But we also need to start thinking about making smarter societies – in which we can grow food and preserve ecosystem services and species at the same time.”

Details of the Paper:

Title of the Paper: “Intensive Agriculture Erodes β-diversity at Large Scales”
Authors: Daniel S. Karp, Andrew J. Rominger, Jim Zook, Jai Ranganathan, Paul R. Ehrlich and Gretchen C. Daily
Published online in ‘Ecology Letters’ on June 21, 2012; DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01815.x
Check the following link to read/download the Full Paper:

Source: By Max Mcclure, Stanford University.

Comments are closed.


Just 3% of Large Listed Companies Report on All Basic Sustainability Metrics

New report finds that only 129 of 4,069 largest companies listed on the world’s stock exchanges are disclosing the most basic sustainability information.

Read More

CDP Reveals List of Companies Doing Most to Combat Climate Change

187 businesses, including BMW AG, Centrica, Samsung Electronics and Unilever, demonstrated superior approach to climate change mitigation, and awarded 'A' grade in CDP Climate Performance Leadership Index 2014.

Read More

Solutions Still within Reach as World Biodiversity Suffers Major Decline

Global wildlife population has declined by more than half in just 40 years as measured in WWF's Living Planet Report 2014, and would eventually threaten Earth’s natural systems and human ...

Read More

Increased Fears about Environment, but Little Change in Consumer Behaviour

Consumers are adopting some sustainable behaviours, but change is not keeping pace with concern for environment, finds NatGeo’s Greendex 2014, which ranked Americans last in consumer sustainability.

Read More

World Population to Keep Growing this Century, Hit 11 Billion by 2100

World population is likely to keep growing throughout the 21st century, and number of people on Earth is likely to reach 11 billion by 2100, about 2 billion higher than ...

Read More

Trending Now

Enter your email address to subscribe to ThinktoSustain.com and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Green Jobs